De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk

Terug naar zoekresultatenDeel deze publicatie

To check or not to check? An exploratory study on source checking by Dutch journalists.

[Preprint version]

Open access

Rechten:Alle rechten voorbehouden

To check or not to check? An exploratory study on source checking by Dutch journalists.

[Preprint version]

Open access

Rechten:Alle rechten voorbehouden

Samenvatting

Verifying information is one of the core activities of journalism. However, recent research shows that many stories derive from unchecked information from news agencies and PR material. That being said, reporters who do not use this pre-packaged material, but who instead produce original stories based on independent research, might be journalists who stay devoted to the verification of information. Therefore, this study focuses on in-depth stories that originated inside the newsroom. We expected that these kinds of stories would be checked and double-checked, because time constraints are less important and these stories are characteristic of independent, quality journalism. Contrary to this expectation, the results show that even these kinds of stories are not always vetted. The lack of time was seldom mentioned as an excuse. Our research points to avoidance mechanisms which inhibit journalists from verifying their information.

Toon meer
OrganisatieHogeschool Utrecht
AfdelingKenniscentrum Digital Business & Media
Kenniscentrum Communicatie en Journalistiek
LectoraatKwaliteitsjournalistiek in Digitale Transitie
Gepubliceerd inJournal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies Intellect, Vol. 1, Uitgave: 2, Pagina's: 241-253
Jaar2012
TypeArtikel
TaalEngels

Op de HBO Kennisbank vind je publicaties van 26 hogescholen

De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk